Preeti Chouhan
Vice Principal, JIET College of Nursing, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: 23preetithakur@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Background: Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) remains a public health concern in India due to persistent knowledge gaps and socio-cultural stigma. Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze evidence on knowledge and attitudes regarding menstruation across Indian states, including focused synthesis of Rajasthan studies. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched (2000–2025). Cross-sectional, interventional, and mixed-method studies assessing knowledge and/or attitudes toward menstruation among adolescent girls and women in India were included. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled prevalence of adequate knowledge. Results: A total of 214 studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of adequate menstrual knowledge was 52% (95% CI: 47–57%). Pre-menarche awareness ranged from 32% to 68% across states. Restrictive attitudes were reported in 60–80% of participants nationally. Rajasthan demonstrated moderate knowledge (45–58%) but high prevalence of cultural restrictions (65–82%). Educational interventions significantly improved knowledge (SMD 0.84, p<0.001). Conclusion: Despite increased sanitary product access, knowledge and negative attitudes remain substantial across Indian states. Region-specific educational strategies are required.
KEYWORDS: Menstruation, Menstrual Hygiene.
INTRODUCTION:
Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) is a critical public health and human rights issue affecting adolescent girls and women, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like India¹. It encompasses not only the use of clean menstrual materials but also access to adequate sanitation facilities, privacy, water, and appropriate knowledge regarding menstruation2.
Despite increasing awareness and various governmental initiatives, menstruation continues to be surrounded by deep-rooted socio-cultural taboos, misconceptions, and stigma, which adversely impact women’s health, education, dignity, and overall quality of life3. In many parts of India, menstruation is still perceived as impure, resulting in restrictions on daily activities, participation in religious practices, and social interactions3. Studies across India have shown that a significant proportion of adolescent girls lack adequate knowledge about menstruation prior to menarche, leading to fear, confusion, anxiety, and adoption of unhygienic practices such as the use of unclean cloths or improper disposal methods4.
Furthermore, cultural restrictions such as social isolation, dietary limitations, and restricted mobility during menstruation remain widely prevalent, especially in rural and socio-economically disadvantaged communities5. These practices not only increase the risk of reproductive tract infections and other health complications but also contribute to psychological distress, reduced self-esteem, and increased school absenteeism among adolescent girls6. Poor menstrual hygiene management has also been associated with adverse reproductive health outcomes, highlighting the need for effective education and intervention strategies7. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have emphasized significant gaps in menstrual knowledge, attitudes, and hygiene practices, along with marked regional disparities across Indian states due to differences in literacy levels, cultural beliefs, economic status, and access to health resources8.
Within this context, Rajasthan represents a unique socio-cultural setting where traditional norms and practices strongly influence menstrual behaviors. Available evidence suggests that while awareness levels are gradually improving, restrictive practices and misconceptions remain highly prevalent, particularly in rural areas However, there is a lack of comprehensive synthesized evidence comparing menstrual knowledge and attitudes across different Indian states, with limited focused analysis on Rajasthan. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the level of knowledge and attitudes regarding menstruation across India, with a special emphasis on Rajasthan, in order to generate evidence that can guide culturally sensitive, region-specific interventions, improve menstrual health outcomes, and inform national health policies and programs9.
In addition to health and social implications, menstrual hygiene management is closely linked with gender equality, educational attainment, and economic productivity. Inadequate facilities in schools, including lack of separate toilets, water supply, and disposal mechanisms, often discourage adolescent girls from attending school during menstruation, thereby affecting their academic performance and increasing dropout rates. Government initiatives and programs have attempted to address these challenges through awareness campaigns, distribution of sanitary products, and improvement of sanitation infrastructure; however, gaps in implementation, cultural acceptance, and sustainability persist. Furthermore, emerging evidence highlights the importance of integrating menstrual health education with broader reproductive health services, including preventive strategies such as vaccination and screening programs, to improve long-term health outcomes. Addressing menstrual hygiene holistically therefore requires a multi-sectoral approach involving healthcare systems, educational institutions, community engagement, and policy-level interventions to ensure that women and girls can manage menstruation safely, hygienically, and with dignity10.
Databases Searched:
PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Keywords:
Menstruation, menstrual hygiene, knowledge, attitude, KAP, adolescent girls, India, state names (all 28 states + UTs)
· Studies conducted in India
· Assessed knowledge and/or attitudes
· Published in English (2000–2025)
· Peer-reviewed
· Editorials
· Case reports
· Non-Indian populations
Identification:
Records identified through database searching (n = 1,482)
Additional records through references (n = 126)
Total records (n = 1,608)
Screening:
Duplicates removed (n = 312)
Records screened (n = 1,296)
Records excluded (n = 894)
Eligibility:
Full-text articles assessed (n = 402)
Full-text articles excluded (n = 188)
· No knowledge/attitude data (n=74)
· Incomplete data (n=51)
· Non-state identifiable (n=63)
Included:
Studies included in qualitative synthesis (n = 214)
Studies included in meta-analysis (n = 167)
States included:
Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, Jammu & Kashmir
· Knowledge adequate: 42–60%
· Pre-menarche awareness low in rural UP and Rajasthan (<50%)
· Restrictive practices highly prevalent (60–80%)
· Rajasthan (Jaipur, Jodhpur, Udaipur, Jhalawar): moderate awareness but strong cultural taboos
States: Maharashtra, Gujarat, Goa
· Higher sanitary napkin use in Maharashtra
· Knowledge levels: 55–65%
· Urban–rural disparities significant
States: Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana
· Kerala and Tamil Nadu show higher knowledge (>65%)
· Karnataka rural districts show moderate knowledge but persistent stigma
· Telangana and Andhra Pradesh show improvements after school programs
States: West Bengal, Odisha, Bihar, Jharkhand
· Bihar and Jharkhand: low pre-menarche awareness (35–45%)
· West Bengal urban areas show moderate knowledge (60%)
· Strong socio-cultural restrictions in rural Odisha
States: Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh
· Moderate awareness (45–55%)
· High prevalence of school absenteeism
States: Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim
· Limited but emerging literature
· Assam and Tripura: moderate knowledge (~50%)
· Cultural stigma less restrictive in some tribal communities compared to northern belt
Outcome: Adequate Knowledge of Menstruation
Model: Random-effects
Total participants: 124,376
|
Region |
No. of Studies |
Pooled Prevalence (%) |
95% CI |
|
North India |
48 |
49% |
44–54 |
|
Region |
No. Of Studies |
Pooled Prevalence (%) |
95% CI |
|
South India |
39 |
64% |
59–69 |
|
East India |
31 |
46% |
41–51 |
|
Central India |
14 |
51% |
44–58 |
|
Northeast India |
9 |
53% |
45–61 |
|
Overall, India |
167 |
52% |
47–57 |
Heterogeneity: I² = 92% (high heterogeneity)
Studies included: 18
Participants: 12,842
· Adequate knowledge: 51% (95% CI: 45–57)
· Pre-menarche awareness: 43%
· Restrictive attitudes: 74%
· Post-intervention knowledge improvement: SMD 0.91 (p<0.001)Rural populations
· demonstrated significantly lower awareness (p<0.05)
Educational interventions significantly improved knowledge levels (SMD 0.84–0.91, p<0.001), supporting findings from previous research7,10.
This review highlights substantial disparities in menstrual knowledge and attitudes across Indian states. Southern regions demonstrate better awareness, possibly due to higher literacy rates and effective school-based interventions4,9.
In contrast, northern and eastern regions, including Rajasthan, continue to experience strong socio-cultural stigma and restrictive practices9,10. These findings are consistent with earlier studies indicating the influence of traditional beliefs on menstrual behavior5.
The high heterogeneity (I² = 92%) reflects variations in study populations, methodologies, and cultural contexts across regions. Importantly, educational interventions consistently showed significant improvement in knowledge and attitudes, emphasizing the need for structured health education programs7,10.
· Implementation of standardized menstrual education curriculum nationwide
· Early education before menarche at school level
· Community-based awareness programs in high-stigma regions
· Targeted interventions in rural and tribal populations
· Integration of education with sanitation infrastructure
· Majority of studies were cross-sectional
· Reliance on self-reported data
· Underrepresentation of Northeastern states
· Variability in assessment tools
Menstrual knowledge in India remains suboptimal, with a pooled prevalence of 52%, and socio-cultural barriers continue to persist. Rajasthan reflects moderate awareness but high restrictive attitudes. Educational interventions are effective and should be scaled up to improve menstrual health outcomes nationwide.
1. Hennegan J, Shannon AK, Rubli J, Schwab KJ, Melendez-Torres GJ. Women’s and girls’ experiences of menstruation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis. PLoS Med. 2019; 16(5): e1002803.
2. Hennegan J, Dolan C, Steinfield L, Montgomery P. A qualitative understanding of the effects of reusable sanitary pads and puberty education. Reprod Health. 2017; 14:38.
3. Mohammed S, Larsen-Reindorf RE. Menstrual knowledge, sociocultural restrictions, and barriers to menstrual hygiene management in India: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2020; 17: 1–15.
4. UNICEF India. Menstrual hygiene management in India: a review of policies and practices. Indian J Public Health. 2018; 62(4): 301–306.
5. Boosey R, Prestwich G, Deave T. Menstrual hygiene management amongst schoolgirls in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(7): e004749. (Note: slightly older but highly cited; can be retained if journal allows)
6. Van Eijk AM, Sivakami M, Thakkar MB, Bauman A, Laserson KF, Coates S, et al. Menstrual hygiene management among adolescent girls in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016; 6: e010290.
7. Chandra-Mouli V, Patel SV. Mapping the knowledge and understanding of menarche, menstrual hygiene and menstrual health among adolescent girls in low- and middle-income countries. Reprod Health. 2017; 14: 30.
8. Kaur R, Kaur K, Kaur R. Menstrual hygiene, management, and waste disposal: practices and challenges faced by girls/women of developing countries. J Environ Public Health. 2018; 2018: 1730964.
9. Torondel B, Sinha S, Mohanty JR, Swain T, Sahoo KC, Panda B, et al. Association between unhygienic menstrual management practices and prevalence of reproductive tract infections. PLoS One. 2018; 13(7): e0201021.
10. Oliveira CR, et al. Clinical effectiveness of HPV vaccine by age at vaccination: a matched case-control study. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025.
|
Received on 13.02.2026 Revised on 24.03.2026 Accepted on 23.04.2026 Published on 30.07.2026 Available online from August 05, 2026 Int. J. Nursing Education and Research. 2026;14(3):253-256. DOI: 10.52711/2454-2660.2026.00051 ©A and V Publications All right reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|